Friday, 2 September 2011
Page 119
John Mackay (a creationist) was
interviewed on the BBC News TV programme called HardTalk. This is a very
watchable and enjoyable rebuttal against the biassed unscientific teachings of
evolutionists.
Evolutionists are unscientific because of their straitjacketed refusal to consider or properly examine the overwhelming evidence of creation and a young Earth.
From my perspective, it appears that John Mackay gives a convincing rebuttal. Please let me know what you think. To watch the video please click on the following shortcut link:
Evolutionists are unscientific because of their straitjacketed refusal to consider or properly examine the overwhelming evidence of creation and a young Earth.
From my perspective, it appears that John Mackay gives a convincing rebuttal. Please let me know what you think. To watch the video please click on the following shortcut link:
Then within that website page click on
the part that says: "Click here to
watch the full
interview". Actually you may get the download if you
click on that second link. If not, go there
via the first link.
That video will then download to your computer (don't worry it is safe - at least was ok on my computer which has antivirus). Then go to your downloads and click on that video.
via the first link.
That video will then download to your computer (don't worry it is safe - at least was ok on my computer which has antivirus). Then go to your downloads and click on that video.
Here is another excellent
video from John Mackay
being interviewed by Richard Dawkins. It is part 1 of 2. The second part has been removed by Channel 4 (I wonder why?, could it be because Richard Dawkins argument has been exposed as very weak?). I managed to find the whole interview on just one video, but it is shown on an atheists blog, so I do not want to give the url here, thereby giving his blog exposure, but i have watched it and can say that it powerfully exposes false evolutionary theory. Anyway, here is the link to part 1, which (temporarily is still accessible:
being interviewed by Richard Dawkins. It is part 1 of 2. The second part has been removed by Channel 4 (I wonder why?, could it be because Richard Dawkins argument has been exposed as very weak?). I managed to find the whole interview on just one video, but it is shown on an atheists blog, so I do not want to give the url here, thereby giving his blog exposure, but i have watched it and can say that it powerfully exposes false evolutionary theory. Anyway, here is the link to part 1, which (temporarily is still accessible:
I would like to add something I have
noticed. Answers In Genesis and John Mackay's creation organisation have
received a lot of bad press. I believe this is because of their very strong
arguments against the status quo of evolutionary thinking. As with all
opponents, their tactic is always the same. If they can rubbish the person's
character or ill behaviour, they feel they have destroyed the argument. To me
that is complete nonsense. What if creationists used the same tactic and delved
into the lives of evolutionists and exposed them as frauds and nasty characters
with hidden agendas (which they do not do, as far as I am aware, because it is
childish) would that (in itself) debunk evoultion? Of course not. However, this
tends to be the approach used by opponents of our faith.
The fact is that no human being is
perfect "to err is human". Christians, also are not perfect. We are
all sinners saved by grace, being gradually changed by the transforming work of
the Holy Spirit (a lifetime work). Just because some may have erred in some
way, does not nullify what they teach, if it is true and sound. Therefore, we
should always ONLY debunk the argument (if it has flaws) and not debunk the
presenter of the argument.
If Creationists give solid evidence,
then do not mock them but instead examine it for yourself
RomaLynn said...
I will certainly watch these as soon as possible.
Thanks for being faithful to keep people up to date here on this blog. We all
need to be able to explain why we believe in creationism.
No comments:
Post a Comment